今天看Mr.Jamie的臉書分享這篇文章，辛苦地看完，稍微紀錄一下
這文章提到收入模式
可以藉[routine or not]、[manual or conginitive]去區分
作息不正常的收入是最好與最壞，用腦袋的當然高於用身體
於是繼續討論人工智慧怎麼進化、學習
與神經般網絡相比較
電腦很行?
那當然是幫忙處理大數據
厲害的AI甚至可以有效接電話、判別我們對廣告的喜愛(註)
取代傳統人類的Nonroutine Automation
那被取代的人怎麼辦?或是未來此種工作走向如何?
作者提出普世基本工資[ universal basic income]
/we may have to consider instituting a basic income guarantee.
作者最後的大哉問:
what’s the purpose of the technologies we’re creating?
What’s the purpose of a car that can drive for us, or artificial intelligence that can shoulder 60% of our workload?
Is it to allow us to work more hours for even less pay?
Or is it to enable us to choose how we work, and to decline any pay/hours we deem insufficient because we’re already earning the incomes that machines aren’t?
---
註:原文介紹的兩種AI
1.
Amelia is just one AI out there currently being beta-tested in companies right now. Created by IPsoft over the past 16 years, she’s learned how to perform the work of call center employees. She can learn in seconds what takes us months, and she can do it in 20 languages. Because she’s able to learn, she’s able to do more over time. In one company putting her through the paces, she successfully handled one of every ten calls in the first week, and by the end of the second month, she could resolve six of ten calls. Because of this, it’s been estimated that she can put 250 million people out of a job, worldwide.
2.
Viv is an AI coming soon from the creators of Siri who’ll be our own personal assistant. She’ll perform tasks online for us, and even function as a Facebook News Feed on steroids by suggesting we consume the media she’ll know we’ll like best. In doing all of this for us, we’ll see far fewer ads, and that means the entire advertising industry — that industry the entire Internet is built upon — stands to be hugely disrupted.
全站熱搜
留言列表
